Sovereignty is in the spotlight, but for all the wrong reasons.

Sovereignty has always been a notion spoken of because one has an understanding of what Natural Law entails and an understanding of who we are as human citizens on planet Earth.  Our responsibility to the planet is to take care of the planet for our future generations and this being one of the highest ideologies one should ever consider beside parenthood.

At present we are so screwed down as a society of free range slaves by legislation and the net just got tighter around the 'slave pen' with the government announcement on those that call themselves 'Sovereign Citizens'.

From the ABC Article

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-30/australias-sovereign-citizen-terrorism-threat/6981114

Anti-government extremists known as "sovereign citizens" have been identified as a potential terrorism threat in Australia by a confidential NSW Police report.

Below are some helpful videos to get your head around the mess the government are present preaching around this issue.  It is imperative to understand that we are being shafted once again and straight on the heels of the "No Jab No Pay" legislation.

And so there must be a good understanding of what Natural Law is and what it isn't.  It most certainly is not the peace love and brown rice a lot of New Age converts spurt.  Natural Law is very very different to this and one should be fully competent in what this entails.

Reading the Corpus Hermeticum and books such as the Kybalion will start you on a journey of understanding if you are not familiar already.  Watching videos by this gentleman Mark Passio can help one understand the intricacies at play here with this push against sovereignty by governments at a much higher level and understand the politicians are mere puppets.

Demonizing Sovereignty only servers to turn brother against brother once again.  Here in Australia there is a huge following for the Sovereign Nations of this land to be recognized for who they are in their own right, and I fear this will also be heaped in with the extremist views of those that are not aboriginal and don't have a reason to want to be recognized as sovereign on this land they have been on for 80.000 years plus.

It only stands to reason why the government is making this word a very dirty word now.  This is back door Genocide once again.  The lack of treaty with those that wish to remain sovereign is Genocide!

Where there is sovereignty, there is Anarchy and anarchy is nothing to be afraid of as it only means no rulers or the absence of a monarch [one ruler].   With the prefix 'An' being none or not, so, No Monarchy = Anarchy. ... from the Latin Archon - to rule which was borrowed from ancient Greek meaning magistrates there or rulers.

(Gnosticism) A supernatural being subordinate to the Demiurge.

and....

"The Natural Liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of Man, but only to have the Law of Nature for his rule"  John Locke

The Great Charter ... known by its Latin name "Magna Carta".

FACTS ABOUT THE MAGNA CARTA 

View image | gettyimages.com

Pictured is a 13th century copy of the Magna Carta manuscript.

The Magna Carta is an 800-year-old document with the core principal contained therein that no-one is above the law.   Today is is used as  the foundation of many legal documents and is still the subject of great conflict regarding it.

The word "Magna Carta" just means 'Great Charter' in Latin. The entire document is in written in Latin text.

The Magna Carta document was first drawn up in 1215.  It was granted by King John on the 15th day of June 1215 at Runnymede.   Runnymede is located near the River Thames in Surrey.

The reason for  Magna Carta's existence and why it was written and granted was because it was originally meant as a peace treaty between King John and his barons, with whom he was at war. King John never 'signed' Magna Carta instead John used his Great Seal to authenticate the document. [Back in the Middle Ages kings never signed their name on documents to pass them into law].

The original Magna Carta had 63 clauses. Today, only three of the original 63 clauses remain on the statute books.

... Of these three surviving clauses remaining one stands to defend the liberties and rights of the English Church, the second confirms the liberties and customs of London and other towns, and lastly a third, which gives all English subjects the right to justice and a fair trial.

Empress_Mathilda.png

For some more really solid research into the Magna Carta go to this website for masses of information relating to its base in law in our modern day Law systems.

http://blogs.loc.gov/law/2013/08/no-taxation-without-representation-circa-1215-ad-or-magna-carta-a-beginners-guide/

Taken from the above website..
Runaway taxation, argued many American colonists, was the signature of tyrannical government.  The Barons who revolted against King John couldn’t have agreed more.  And where there is a danger of a king turning tyrant, the Barons proposed that there is a need for a strong system of checks and balances.  Chapter 61 of Magna Carta created a council of review that was empowered to monitor the King’s government and to take (legal!) military action against the king when his actions defied the limits imposed by the charter.  The king is not above the law.

None shall be imprisoned nor put out of his Freehold, nor of his Franchises nor free Custom.... this does not fit with what has happened to the first people of this nation today or anytime in the colonial past.

Welcome to the Jungle as Guns n Roses said.... welcome to the world of legal jargon and mad Latin phrases that curl your toes.  I dare say it was a  huge learning experience for Brice to go over all this in detail.   The Mortgage. or Death Contract as it could be better translated to

Images @ Eminpee Fotography - Brice with a bunch of Legal Papers