Showing posts with label Rosella. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rosella. Show all posts

Saturday, April 26, 2014

The Clocks tick louder at the Bentley Blockade

~ By Marie Cameron ~ 

Marie is a fellow Protector, Friend, Photographer and Journalist.  We met protecting together a couple of years ago.

Early morning, Gate A, Bentley Blockade. Photo Marie Cameron
Early morning, Gate A, Bentley Blockade. Photo Marie Cameron
Marie Cameron, onsite at the Bentley Blockade
Gone is the grass from Metgasco’s Rosella entrance.  Overhead are two monopoles and two tripods with interactive lines. On the ground you can barely walk between the many time-delay installations.

All are lock-on devices to provide ‘simmos’ with a multiple of choices to thread their arms into locking points. Some are booby-trapped with underground dragons.

The latest to arrive at Gate A is a red Toyota. With ‘Know Hope’ painted on its windscreen it’s set to go the distance and drive Metgasco mad.
With Metgasco’s share price in the poor box and its mine site under a 3,000-strong protest, the car mirrors Metgasco; derailed, worthless and going nowhere.
Locked-on Toyota at Rosella well Gate A. Photo Marie Cameron
Locked-on Toyota at Rosella well Gate A. Photo Marie Cameron
The use of cars as a lock-on and dragon device is not a new blockade stunt. Metgasco is well aware of their use.

At the Glenugie blockade the fiery Traumatron crashed the gates to hold centre stage for nine hours.That car contained the dragon of all dragons; made from layers of intricate and interconnected locks it made a massive barrier. Locked in its centre was Lismore artist, Rodney Sharpe.
At the Doubtful Creek blockade the old family Ford dubbed the Githabul Growler was locked across the Eden Creek State Forest gateway for weeks.
On its final day of existence four simmos locked on and held Metgasco at bay for seven hours.
Bad health effects confirmed
Tuesday’s morning dawn crowd saw Dr Geralyn McCarron in its midst.
It was her second visit to Bentley. This Brisbane-based family physician is the author of the 2013 report Symptomatology of a Gas Field. An independent health survey in the Tara rural residential estates and environs.

Dr McCarron enjoyed looking over the gas-well-free hills of Bentley. When she spoke of a life lived in the Tara CSG industrial zone her eyes clouded with concern.
‘Most people in the community are sick. It depends on how many wells are flaring, who’s drilling wells, which way the wind is blowing, what the processing plant is releasing, the holding ponds and the road sprays. There are many variables,’ Dr McCarron said.
Dr Geralyn McCarron visits the Bentley Blockade to warn about the health effects of living in a gasfield that she has observed in Tara. Photo Marie Cameron
Dr Geralyn McCarron visits the Bentley Blockade to warn about the health effects of living
in a gasfield that she has observed in Tara.
Photo Marie Cameron
‘The mental focus is one of the first things to be affected. You’re just so tired you can’t think and there are many reasons.
‘Extreme worry, everything you own is violated, you can’t sleep there is so much stuff going on. The kids are sick!
‘Co-existence is not a viable option. You can’t live in a gas processing plant. It’s an extreme industrial zone!
‘You don’t have babies living in a processing plant. When you try to mix them you don’t get a good outcome,’ said Dr McCarron.

‘CSG-related health complaints include eye irritations, nosebleeds, headaches, coughs, respiratory problems, skin irritation, muscle pain, numbness, fatigue and sore joints and the list goes on.
‘The problem faced by every person living in a gas field is debilitation. People don’t have the energy to fight the government and gain support or recognition.

‘The Queensland government did not make a baseline health study and now the onus is on the person to prove they’re affected by CSG.
‘I have to find an indisputable link. The only protection is not to allow it to happen. If you have any doubt take a trip to Tara. Communities have fallen by the wayside.
‘When you cannot live and breathe you need to walk away but when you live there, you can’t,’ she said.
With the gas zones of Tara on her mind, Dr McCarron looked across the blockade.
‘The difference,’ she said ‘is here democracy is actually happening! People aren’t just voting; they are taking an interactive part in what is happening.’
The people in Brisbane are ‘oblivious’.

The battle of  Gate C

The blockade has completed three months and Metgasco has yet to get a portaloo across the line. Metgasco has two choices. It could repeat history and declare political instability as a reason to exit gracefully or it could push ahead.

Either way the waiting game reached a new level when the blockade clock ticked louder on Wednesday. Some Richmond Valley Council workers made an appearance at Gate A. With the camp still holding record numbers, people are watching any council movements very closely.
The vigil at Gate C of the Bentley Blockade on Naughtons Gap Road. Photo Marie Cameron
The vigil at Gate C of the Bentley Blockade on Naughtons Gap Road. Photo Marie Cameron
Gate B has a dedicated crew of organised protectors ready to give Metgasco their best efforts.

Gate C has an unusual history.
Last week saw Ian Gaillard tell protectors to clear the gate as Lock the Gate had a clear understanding with Metgasco they would not enter through Gate C.

Protectors were reluctant to leave as they could see how police could use the gate for their entry. Gate C is placed on the Bentley Road and is almost opposite Naughtons Gap Road. It is easy to access from both roads so protectors kept re-establishing the block.

To support their efforts they built a vigil camp on the high ground across the road. The police arrived toward the end of the week to protect the council workers who were there to clear the gate. Protectors were warned by the police to stay out of the way or be arrested.

Regardless, Gate C has been rebuilt and the vigil camp has gained more stayers. It would seem Gate C is the new Bentley Blockade frontline.

Doug Keogh from Kyogle was observing from the side of the road. Doug has eight grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. His father had fought in World War II, his son was in the air force, and his daughter had seen action in Afghanistan in the Australian army.
‘Now we’ve got this,’ he said. ‘We have been taken over without a shot fired.  ‘I’ve seen good and I’ve seen bad and in my opinion this is bad.
‘They’re going to make good people into criminals.’
'They're going to make good people into criminals': Doug Keogh from Kyogle survey's Metgasco's site. Photo Marie Cameron
‘They’re going to make good people into criminals’:
Doug Keogh from Kyogle surveys Metgasco’s site.Photo Marie Cameron
This article was submitted to Econetdaily.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The ROSELLA REF (Review of Environmental Factors)

I am always ever so comforted that there are protectors that are skilled to be able to read some of this documentation put out by Metgasco and the likes of these Gas mining companies.  Below is some stuff that I found terribly interesting that has come to light lately.

IMG 8222
They want to turn this into a GASFIELD
 FROM COAL SEAM GAS NEWS

REF (REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS)

METGASCO WEBSITE ANNOUNCEMENT to their SHAREHOLDERS
Rosella E01
The Rosella E01 well will test the conventional and tight gas potential of the Greater Mackellar structure and follows the discovery of gas in conventional sands in the Kingfisher E01 well in 2009. Rosella E01 is not a coal seam gas well.
The primary objective for this well is the Ripley Road sandstone that was tested in Kingfisher E01, south of Casino. The well will also test the thick sequence of gas bearing strata in the Gatton sandstone that had low permeability, together with the deeper Basal Bundamba Sandstone (a lateral equivalent to the Laytons Range Conglomerate), Ipswich and Nymboida Coal Measures that were below the depth reached in Kingfisher-1.
If significant gas is found, the well will be tested to determine if an economic gas rate can be established from zones of interest and then, subject to results, suspended for further testing and evaluation. In the event that the well fails to find suitable reservoir zones, it will be plugged and abandoned and the site rehabilitated and restored to pre-drill condition.
The well is to be drilled on the site of an old, unused quarry. An access agreement with the landowner is in place. A community consultation program has been initiated.
Metgasco’s Managing Director, Mr Peter Henderson, said: “The Rosella E01 well is important for Metgasco and the State of New South Wales. Nearly all of the gas currently used in New South Wales, about 95 per cent, is imported from interstate. Beyond 2016 these gas supplies are not secure. Gas prices in New South Wales are expected to increase significantly in the next few years and there are substantial community concerns over the inability to contract gas supplies. A successful result for Rosella E01 will help secure energy supplies for New South Wales, manage prices and provide employment opportunities in the Northern Rivers region.”
ACTIVIST LETTER/ METGASCO LIES ABOUT THE TRUTH TO SHAREHOLDERS
Metgasco has become aware of a letter to shareholders from an anti-gas activist group. This letter was sent to shareholders using personal details contained on the company’s share registry. Metgasco hasnot yet determined how the group obtained access to this shareholder information, but it was not via Metgasco or its agents. The letter contains statements which are false and misleading and have the potential to give rise to a false market in the trading of Metgasco securities. The matter has been referred to ASIC for investigation. Metgasco wishes to correct two of the false and misleading statements with the following:
1. Fact: Metgasco enjoys the support of the NSW Government, the council in which it works and the local community in which it works.

Contrary to what the letter states, it is not true that more than 90% of residents are opposed to drilling for unconventional gas. Metgasco has valid exploration licences, issued by the elected government of NSW, and all of the company’s field operations are subject to environmental approvals and comply with government regulations – Metgasco has the legal right to explore. Metgasco has a strong degree of support in the areas in which it operates, with 10 years of field activities and more than 300 voluntary landholder agreements. Arbitration rights to obtain land access have never been used. Most of Metgasco’s activities are near Casino, in the Richmond Valley Council area. A poll in late 2012 by the Richmond Valley Council showed that 70% of voters supported coal seam gas provided that it was safe and environmentally sound.

2. Fact: Metgasco suspended its CSG operations in early 2013 because the unexpected February 2013 announcement of NSW Government policy and administrative changes made near term investment in NSW unattractive
.

The letter’s suggestion that the 2013 protest actions at Doubtful Creek led to the suspension of the company’s current operations is wrong and misleading. This protest had no bearing on Metgasco’s decision, and operations were suspended, not terminated.
Prior to the NSW Government’s announcement, Metgasco had successfully completed a seismic acquisition program and the drilling of two CSG wells, despite protest action. During drilling operations there were on average about 30 routine protestors on site, with 100 to 200 protestors during short rig mobilisation periods. Many of the protestors were "professional protestors" and/or from outside the operational areas. The protests caused some delay to the program, comparable to a delay due to adverse weather often experienced in this region. The financial effect of the protests was not material and, again, the protest action was not the reason for Metgasco’s suspension decision.
I decided to Blog this part from Coal Seam Gas News about the map differences because this is the sort of information we should be looking at because the Devil will be in the details.  There details are just not true so this will not be able to be completely concealed no matter how much they try to dress it up.
 The preliminary well schematic from the Rosella REF indicates a 7inch inner bore casing will be used from 0-2100m (Kingfishers inner casing was only 4.5in)
I haven’t had time to look further into why a larger production casing could be used but I’m thinking fraccing??
According to this site fraccing has a lot to do with casing design.
http://petrowiki.spe.org/PEH:Casing_Design
Click for larger images
Roselle REF - Preliminary Well Schematic

Rosella Community Handout - Rosella Targets
Rosella Community Handout - Geology Graphic

Rosella Community Handout - Siesmic Graphic
Rosella REF - Drilling Activities
Rosella REF - Expected Geology










Also Note:
The well schematic in the Rosella Community Consultation is completely different to the well schematic in the Rosella REF. I think they used some old Kingfisher graphics in the Community Consultation.
NB. All screenshots came from these two documents:
http://www.resourcesandenergy.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/461461/2013-03-Metgasco-Rosella-REF-Conventional-Gas.pdf
http://www.metgasco.com.au/sites/metgasco.com.au/files/14.03.03 Rosella community handout Smaller size_0.pdf


Images @ Eminpee Fotography
Enhanced by Zemanta