Abbott Point has to be stopped:
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
The maddness of this is so evident but the people cannot stop them. How do we stop them. Where is Prince Charles? He loved the reef so much and is a greenie. Get Prince on the job!
Seagrass offsets labelled a ‘sick joke’
By John Mikkelsen
Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke has come under attack from environmental groups including the
Gladstone Conservation Council over his recent proposal for miners to provide environmental offsets for seagrass beds.
Mr Burke announced the proposal at the Coast to
Coast conference in Brisbane last week, when he suggested mining
companies could offset damage they do to seagrass, the main diet of
dugong and turtles.
He said miners could offset the damage to seagrass, similar to how environmental offsets are managed on land.
But environmentalists were quick to point out inadequacies in how offsets for the loss of seagrass in
Gladstone Harbour had been handled, with one labeling it “a sick joke”.
Gladstone Conservation Council Inc expressed alarm at “some serious inconsistencies” in the Minister’s address.
Spokesman Jan Arens said it was not clear how offsets arrangements could provide a no-net-loss outcome to the environment.
“No amount of money spent on monitoring or research compensates for physical seagrass lost.
“There are no successful case histories on land or at sea where
offsets have provided a real net benefit to the environment,” he said.
“The Minister draws our attention to the important role of seagrass
beds in carbon sequestration and expresses concern about the global loss
of seagrass, but fails to acknowledge his contribution when he approved
the
Western Basin Dredging project”.
Mr Arens said 443 hectares of “the most contiguous seagrass” was lost from within the Great Barrier Reef
World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). This seagrass was also within a declared
Dugong Protection Area.
The Balaclava Island offset consisted of marine flood plains and mangroves within the GBRWHA.
“It has no equivalency to the seagrass beds lost, and is already protected by world heritage listing”.
Mr Arens said the International Union for
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) had “very specifically criticized the
offsets” because they did not compensate for losses resulting from the
developments .The UN’s
World Heritage Committee also did not support the offsets applied to the harbour and Curtis Island developments.
Meanwhile, a Rescue the Reef Coalition has been established online at the
Great Barrier Reef Blog (
http://www.greatbarrierreef.org.au/great-barrier-reef-blog/) which contains several articles criticizing the offsets proposal and the Gladstone developments.
Environmental medicine specialist Dr Andrew Jeremijenko who
has been a long term critic of how environmental controls are applied in
Gladstone Harbour, told the Telegraph yesterday that Mr Burke’s plan to use
it as the model for seagrass offets was “a sick joke” as monitoring had
shown how poorly Gladstone Ports Corporation had stayed within the
limits, and how poorly the limits were enforced.
“We don’t want to see another dugong mortality
hotspot, arsenic-poisoned turtles and sick fish with lesions replicated
in other areas of the Great Barrier Reef
World Heritage Area,”
Dr Jeremijenko said.
He said
Mr Burke and a succession of state
environment ministers had given the Ports Corporation approval to
affect a total 1,493 hectares of seagrass and 5,000 hectares of seabed
in the harbour.
“Tony Burke had promised the chairman of GBRMPA Mr Russell Reichelt
that he would ensure water quality and protect the marine life when
Mr Reichelt had expressed extreme concerns to the Federal Government about the associated dredging operation.
“The water quality monitoring has just shown how inept his department, the
State Goverment and the GPC are at staying within the water quality limits,”
Dr Jeremijenko said.
He claimed the turbidity levels at several harbour monitors last week
had exceeded State levels for five days and federal limits for almost
seven days. The GPC had applied for an exemption from stopping
dredging, and had continued to dredge over the limits, he said.
“If
Mr Burke wanted to protect the seagrass, he would start by enforcing the water quality limits that he promised in this
World Heritage Area, to
Mr Reichelt, to UNESCO and to Australians.
“He is almost ensuring the Great Barrier Reef will be placed on the
World Heritage in Danger list, by selling parts of the
World Heritage area to a bunch of miners,”
Dr Jeremijenko said..
Re Blogged from
THE GREAT BARRIER REEF
Read more Quotes
PHOTOGRAPHS