Showing posts with label Senate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senate. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Clive Palmer and his Party in Senate hot water.

Entrance to the Senate
Entrance to the Senate (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Clive Palmer has been heavily criticized for his attack on Senate clerk Rosemary Laing over her advice on the carbon tax repeal amendment bill.

Members of the Upper house defended the senate clerks position after Clive Palmer suggested she should get out of the job if she was not prepared to take instruction from him.


Rosemary Laing spoke to the party about this and said that a PUP amendment to the carbon tax repeal legislation was unconstitutional.   Clive Palmer disputed this enthusiastically and he also denies the accusations he yelled at the clerk.

Senator Nick Xenophon thinks Clive should apologise and described his actions as that of a bully
.

Clive Palmer replied with a statement describing
Laing's actions  as akin to Stalinist Russia and continued to justify his actions as standing up for the people.
English: Detail from Government. Mural by Elih...
English: Detail from Government. Mural by Elihu Vedder. Lobby to Main Reading Room, Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C. Main figure is seated atop a pedestal saying "GOVERNMENT" and holding a tablet saying "A GOVERNMENT / OF THE PEOPLE / BY THE PEOPLE / FOR THE PEOPLE". Artist's signature is "ELIHU VEDDER / ROMA–1896". (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
"She can't interfere and stop them from doing it - that's what it boils down to. Otherwise you get a bureaucrat being able to veto legislation and we don't want that. That's what happens in Stalinist Russia," Mr Palmer said.
"We don't seek her advice, we seek to put things to the Senate and she's inconsequential to us as to what she thinks.  It's what the Australian people think and what they've elected us to do. 
"Our party will always want to put things that we decide, not what the clerks decide".
"She's not a member of our party, she hasn't been elected to Parliament, she's employed by the Parliament to draft legislation in accordance with instructions and she can't really refuse those instructions."
"If that's her job, well, she has to get out of that job". Read More
IMG 6226
Coat of Arms - Australia
Images @ Eminpee Fotography

Friday, July 11, 2014

The Rusted up Political wheel - PUP, PUPPIES or just plain DOGS!


Legislation on Carbon ...  the Palmer United Party (pup) and politics - we are steeped in interesting political times and it is very worthwhile understanding what is happening in Australia with the tax on Carbon and the tax on Mining and who is paying who and who is not paying anyone and lining their own pockets for later.  The rusty wheels in politics in Australia appear all but seized .. a bit of grease will get them going... greasing the wheels always does.

IMG 9334 Legend Cement Mixer

Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox summed up their concerns:
Any further amendments intended to ensure that carbon savings are passed on should be carefully scrutinised. Amendments that drag in the broader business community would be unworkable and cause regulatory mayhem, particularly as so many businesses have absorbed the carbon price and not passed it on to their customers.
So what are parts of the PUP's amendment have caused all the confusion?
Clause 19 (60FD) states that only gas and electricity companies are liable to face fines if they don't pass on savings to consumers.
However, clause 10 has caused most of the fuss. Here, the amendment lists entities that are covered by the repeal bill's laws against price exploitation, and states:
Entity means any of the following:
(a) an individual;
(b) a body corporate;
(c) an entity sole;
(d) a body politic;
(e) a partnership;
(f) any other unincorporated association or body of entitys;
(g) a trust;
(h) any party or entity which can or does buy or sell electricity or gas
There is an expectancy now that the  Palmer United Party and the Government will vote on these amendments next week.
Images @ Eminpee Fotography

Thursday, March 27, 2014

The Tabling of the BIG BAN Petition against Csg in Australia.

The Big Ban Petition was the brain storm and hard work of Jennifer Schoelpple.  The idea sprang  to life and went Australia wide.  Jennifer crossed all the 'T's and dotted her 'I's with precision so that  this petition was absolutely inline with the petitions committee and was a correct legal document.

IMG 6566
Jennifer and Radha in Sydey with the petition
There has been much discussion regarding the legality of petitions by others around us all in the movement against gas mining and at the moment these types of "correct" petitions still carry the correct weight in the parliamentary stakes.  If you want to get this tabled in parliament you must adhere to the strict petition rules to wit.

So with stocks of printed petitions we hit the streets.  We are ordinary people who care.  People who Jennifer trusted and people who she knew would support her to bring this action to fruition.  We were passionate in our cause.  We need to see this industry completely  banned, there is no safe place for this type of mining in Australia.

IMG 7689
Signing the Petition at Wingham Town Hall
There have been so many times we have talked to countless numbers of  people over the past months.  Discussions explaining the serious nature of this type of mining  and the risks to the aquifers by contamination.  The industry itself providing plenty of material from which to draw from on a daily basis - re spills and corruption.

We have actively educated other citizens regarding the lies and the corruption  evident between the revolving doors of politics and mining. 

I take great pleasure in  pointing out the politicians who have taken the cushy mining CEO positions as well as drawing a government pension after leaving politics and after setting up the mining deals while they were in public office.

IMG 8119 Big Ban Petition Handover
Dr David Gillespie with the Petitions and looking at our signs.
The hard work  of collecting the signatures came to a head last weekend in Port Macquarie.  

We gathered  as a very concerned and passionate group of people specifically to present the petitions (thousands) to Dr David Gillespie.  

Dr Gillespie is  the sitting Member for Lyne.  We organized the handover to occur at the Port Macquarie Airport as Dr Gillespie was catching his Canberra flight from there.  He flew down to Canberra for his sitting in parliament, reason we wanted this on his lips as he left our area.  

He was somewhat taken by surprize by the amount of people there waiting for him and the media attention this drew around him.  He appeared a little nervous and his answers to media questions regarding Coal Seam Gas Mining were weak and stodgy with no emphasis at all on the important issues of water. 

He discussed economic benefits as apposed to looking at the environmental concerns that are far more serious.  I didn't hear anything that alluded to banning the industry.  

Dr Gillespie said “As the Federal Member I am happy to table or present petitions to the Parliament on behalf of my constituents if requested, regardless of my own views on the broad range of topics that are canvassed across the political spectrum.”

IMG 8117 Big Ban Petition Handover

Dr Gillespie transported the petitions to Canberra from Port Macquarie.  




Just before 11.00am he tabled these said petitions in the Upper House, below is film of him doing this (via Peter Deane)



Larissa Waters was tabling the Petitions for the Senate, at least she made a firm promise to do this and so there is no concern to whether it will happen or not.

IMG 6070 Suzanne and Kathy and Larissa Waters
Suzanna, Kathy and Larissa Waters at Parliament House Canberra
The next step after this is to petition the NSW State governments and all of the various State Governments around Australia with the very same petition regarding this type of mining in Australia.  

Well done to everyone who helped to bring this petition to the Parliament of Australia to effect the kind of change we need to protect our environment for our children's futures. 

Comment from Jennifer regarding the process :
"It goes on Hansard as a record that we have requested an immediate moratorium on unconventional gas and a total national ban (this being the ONLY petition to have approached it Nationally) and we now go about getting the 10,000 in as many states and territories as possible (we will try to get a person or committee in each one to oversee it) and then we can demand a 20 min debate in the legislative assembly in all those states.

These will also be the ONLY petitions to demand state/territory wide bans as all other petitions, as far as I know, have been site specific (only interested in a particular area/region) which - if effective - would do nothing more than to ease pressure in that area and force more on other areas. Not acceptable, as far as I'm concerned. NOWHERE should be forced to tolerate this industry for myriad reasons. 

Agreed?

 
(1 min 36 sec) Mel Pretorius's Video Story produced for Fairfax Media (Port Macquarie News) and was posted to their website on Monday 24 March 2014.

In it, we hear from Dame Jennifer Schoelpple, Dame Julie Lyford, and Dr Sir David Gillespie, MP (National Party of Australia).
More Links :
Camden Haven Courier - MP DELIVERS ON CSG PROMISE

 Images  @ Eminpee Fotography
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 10, 2013

PUP is having Puppies


The PALMER UNITED PARTY and THE CAR PARTY are having a party and demanding Abott bring the chips and dip.

IMG 3595 School gate littered with Voting slogans

Exerpt from the SMH
Mining magnate Clive Palmer is threatening to block all the Abbott government's legislation – even measures he supports such as scrapping the carbon price – unless his party gets more staff and resources.After striking a deal with Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party senator-elect Ricky Muir to form a balance-of-power voting bloc of four seats in the Senate from next July, Mr Palmer demanded the same staffing and resources as the Greens, who currently hold the balance.
 
Images @ Eminpee Fotography

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, August 12, 2013

People are celebrating everywhere because of Brians decision to stand for the Senate!

The Stop Csg Party has scored a top candidate in Mr Brian Monk from Kogan outside of Dalby Queensland.  What a top man he is and he is well equipped now to go forward with all of the expert knowledge this man has gained in his fight with BIG GAS over the past few years.

IMG 2331 

In this image above is Brian, Annette, and Gordon Fraser-Quick with the hat on.  I traveled around with them for a day up at the Tara Gas fields and it was a very shocking but enlightening time.  The reason why Brian is standing for the senate would be because this is where the laws are made and this is where he can have the most impact on this industry. 

He has gone as far as he can now fighting the csg industry in his own steam and I guess its time to join forces and take it to them at the big house of politics in Brisbane. 

So the announcement from Stop Csg went like this:  
We are very proud to present Brian Monk, Lead Federal Parliament Candidate in Queensland for The Senate, The Stop CSG Party. Brian, a farmer on 5000 acres in Kogan, brings a wealth of 'on the ground' experience from the gas fields in Queensland to the Senate ticket.

Photo: We are very proud to present Brian Monk, Lead Federal Parliament Candidate in Queensland for The Senate, The Stop CSG Party. Brian, a farmer on 5000 acres in Kogan,  brings a wealth of 'on the ground' experience from the gas fields in Queensland to the Senate ticket.

Brian was quoted as saying,
"Well you will probably be surprised, but I'm sick of having no voice in Government, so here we go.
Coal Seam Gas Mining has been a devastating experience for us, so now we see another chapter in this fight.
Time to tackle this from within. I am proud to be part of the Stop CSG Party and I guess the name explains this fully.  Lets join together and Stop CSG"

TODAY IS ALSO SHELBY'S FIRST BIRTHDAY, Not to forget this special day on the day.  Happy Birthday to you Shelby. xxx
 Images @ Eminpee Fotography

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Poll just out says Assange could win Australian Senate seat

Could this happen?

IMG 1397 Sth Grafton  Ho Down
Source #1
Source #2

 Julian Assange's bid for a seat in Australia's Senate may not be just a stunt, with a new poll revealing 26 per cent of Australians consider themselves “likely” to vote for the Leaker-In-Chief.

English: Julian Assange, photo ("sunny co...
English: Julian Assange, photo ("sunny country background"http://web.archive.org/web/20060712184552/http://iq.org/index.html) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Assange has repeatedly announced his candidacy for a seat in the Senate, the upper chamber of Australia's national Parliament which comprises 12 representatives from each of the nation's six States, plus a pair from each of its Territories. Half of each State's Senate Seats will be decided at Federal election scheduled for September 14th. 2013.

What is the Senate in Australia:
The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Imp.) of 1900 established the Senate as part of the new system of dominion government in newly federated Australia. From a comparative governmental perspective, the Australian Senate exhibits distinctive characteristics. Unlike upper houses in other Westminster system governments, the Senate is not a vestigial body with limited legislative power. 

Rather it was intended to play, and does play, an active role in legislation. Rather than being modelled after the House of Lords, as the Canadian Senate was, the Australian Senate was in part modelled after the United States Senate, by giving equal representation to each state. The Constitution intended to give less populous states added voice in a Federal legislature, while also providing for the revising role of an upper house in the Westminster system.

Although the Prime Minister, by convention, serves as a member of the House of Representatives, other ministers may come from either house, and the two houses have almost equal legislative power. As with most upper chambers in bicameral parliaments, the Senate cannot introduce appropriation bills (bills that authorise government expenditure of public revenue) or bills that impose taxation, that role being reserved for the lower house.

That degree of equality between the Senate and House of Representatives reflects the desire of the Constitution's authors to address smaller states' desire for strong powers for the Senate as a way of ensuring that the interests of more populous states as represented in the House of Representatives did not totally dominate the government.

This situation was also partly due to the age of the Australian constitution – it was enacted before the confrontation in 1909 in Britain between the House of Commons and the House of Lords, which ultimately resulted in the restrictions placed on the powers of the House of Lords by the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949.

In practice, however, most legislation (except for private member's bills) in the Australian Parliament is initiated by the Government, which has control over the lower house. It is then passed to the Senate, which may amend the bill or refuse to pass it. In the majority of cases, voting takes place along party lines, although there are occasional conscience votes.

Who is our Senate now? :
 The Senate is the upper house of the bicameral Parliament of Australia, the lower house being the House of Representatives. The composition and powers of the Senate are established in Chapter I, Part II of the Australian Constitution.

There is a total of 76 senators; 12 senators are elected from each state, regardless of population, and the two internal territories have two senators each. Senators are popularly elected under a system of proportional representation.

 There is no constitutional requirement for the election of senators to take place at the same time as those for members of the House of Representative, though the government usually tries to synchronise the election date.

Senators normally serve fixed six-year terms, unless the Senate is dissolved earlier in a double dissolution. Following a double dissolution half the state senators serve only three-year terms. The term of the territory senators expires at the same time as there is an election for the House of Representatives.

IMG 4144 Vote Here
Unlike most upper houses in parliamentary systems, the Senate is vested with significant power, including the capacity to block legislation initiated by the government in the House of Representatives, making it a distinctive hybrid of British Westminster bicameralism and US-style bicameralism.

The present Parliament was elected at the 2010 election, and is the 43rd Federal Parliament since Federation. The six-year term of the 36 state senators who were elected commenced on 1 July 2011. In the 76-seat Senate, the Coalition holds 34 seats, and the Australian Labor Party holds 31 seats.

The Greens hold the sole balance of power with a total of nine seats, previously holding a shared balance of power with the Family First Party and independent Nick Xenophon, while the two remaining seats are occupied by Xenophon and Democratic Labor Party Senator John Madigan.

Information on the Senate from Wiki

Images @ Eminpee Fotography

Enhanced by Zemanta