And so.... It's Constitutional.

• Overview of the Constitution, Chapter-by-Chapter
• Full Text (Including Amendments) On One Page
• Full Text – Downloadable PDF

Chapter-by-Chapter

• Preamble
• Chapter 1 – The Parliament – Sections 1-60
  • Part 1 – General – Sections 1-6
  • Part 2 – Senate – Sections 7-23
  • Part 3 – House of Representatives – Sections 24-40
  • Part 4 – Both Houses – Sections 41-50
  • Part 5 – Powers – Sections 51-60
• Chapter 2 – The Executive Government – Sections 61-70
• Chapter 3 – The Judicature – Sections 71-80
• Chapter 4 – Finance and Trade – Sections 81-105
• Chapter 5 – The States – Sections 106-120
• Chapter 6 – New States – Sections 121-124
• Chapter 7 – Miscellaneous – Section 125-127
• Chapter 8 – Alteration of the Constitution – Section 128
• Schedule – Oath and Affirmation

Section-by-Section

If you know the number of the Section of the Constitution you want to check, just click on the applicable link below. The text will appear in a popup window.

• Section 1 – Legislative Power
• Section 2 – Governor-General
• Section 3 – Salary of Governor-General
• Section 4 – Provisions relating to Governor-General
• Section 5 – Sessions of Parliament – Prorogation and Dissolution
• Section 6 – Summoning Parliament
• Section 7 – The Senate
• Section 8 – Qualifications of Electors
• Section 9 – Method of election of senators
• Section 10 – Application of State laws
• Section 11 – Failure to choose senators
• Section 12 – Issue of writs
• Section 13 – Rotation of senators
• Section 14 – Further provision for rotation
• Section 15 – Casual vacancies
• Section 16 – Qualifications of senator
• Section 17 – Election of President
• Section 18 – Absence of President
• Section 19 – Resignation of senator
• Section 20 – Vacancy by absence
• Section 21 – Vacancy to be notified
• Section 22 – Quorum
• Section 23 – Voting in the Senate
• Section 24 – Constitution of House of Representatives
• Section 25 – Provisions as to races disqualified from voting
• Section 26 – Representatives in first Parliament
• Section 27 – Alteration of number of members
• Section 28 – Duration of House of Representatives
• Section 29 – Electoral divisions
• Section 30 – Qualification of electors
• Section 31 – Application of State laws
• Section 32 – Writs for general election
• Section 33 – Writs for vacancies
• Section 34 – Qualifications of members
• Section 35 – Election of Speaker
• Section 36 – Absence of Speaker
• Section 37 – Resignation of member
• Section 38 – Vacancy by absence
• Section 39 – Quorum
• Section 40 – Voting in House of Representatives
• Section 41 – Rights of electors of States
• Section 42 – Oath or affirmation of allegiance
• Section 43 – Member of one House ineligible for other
• Section 44 – Disqualification
• Section 45 – Vacancy on happening of disqualification
• Section 46 – Penalty for sitting when disqualified
• Section 47 – Disputed elections
• Section 48 – Allowance to members
• Section 49 – Privileges &c. of Houses
• Section 50 – Rules and orders
• Section 51 – Legislative powers of the Parliament
• Section 52 – Exclusive powers of the Parliament
• Section 53 – Powers of the Houses in respect of legislation
• Section 54 – Appropriation Bills
• Section 55 – Tax Bill
• Section 56 – Recommendation of money votes
• Section 57 – Disagreement between the Houses
• Section 58 – Royal assent to Bills & Recommendations by Governor-General
• Section 59 – Disallowance by the Queen
• Section 60 – Signification of Queen’s pleasure on Bills reserved
• Section 61 – Executive power
• Section 62 – Federal Executive Council
• Section 63 – Provisions referring to Governor-General
• Section 64 – Ministers of State & Ministers to sit in Parliament
• Section 65 – Number of ministers
• Section 66 – Salaries of Ministers
• Section 67 – Appointment of civil servants
• Section 68 – Command of naval and military forces
• Section 69 – Transfer of certain departments
• Section 70 – Certain powers of Governors to vest in Governor-General
• Section 71 – Judicial power and Courts
• Section 72 – Judges’ appointment, tenure and remuneration
• Section 73 – Appellate jurisdiction of High Court
• Section 74 – Appeal to Queen in Council
• Section 75 – Original jurisdiction of High Court
• Section 76 – Additional original jurisdiction
• Section 77 – Power to define jurisdiction
• Section 78 – Proceedings against Commonwealth or State
• Section 79 – Number of judges
• Section 80 – Trial by jury
• Section 81 – Consolidated Revenue Fund
• Section 82 – Expenditure charged thereon
• Section 83 – Money to be appropriated by law
• Section 84 – Transfer of officers
• Section 85 – Transfer of property of State
• Section 86 – Collection and control of duties to pass to Commonwealth
• Section 87 – Revenue to be paid to States in first ten years
• Section 88 – Uniform duties of customs
• Section 89 – Payment to States before uniform duties
• Section 90 – Exclusive power over customs, excise, and bounties
• Section 91 – Exceptions as to bounties
• Section 92 – Trade within the Commonwealth to be free
• Section 93 – Payment to States for five years after uniform tariffs
• Section 94 – Distribution of surplus
• Section 95 – Customs duties of Western Australia
• Section 96 – Financial assistance to States
• Section 97 – Audit
• Section 98 – Trade and commerce includes navigation and State railways
• Section 99 – Commonwealth not to give preference
• Section 100 – Nor abridge right to use water
• Section 101 – Inter-State Commission
• Section 102 – Parliament may forbid preferences by State
• Section 103 – Commissioners’ appointment, tenure, and remuneration
• Section 104 – Saving of certain rates
• Section 105 – Taking over public debts of States
• Section 106 – Saving of Constitutions
• Section 107 – Saving of Power of State Parliaments
• Section 108 – Saving of State laws
• Section 109 – Inconsistency of laws
• Section 110 – Provisions referring to Governor
• Section 111 – States may surrender territory
• Section 112 – States may levy charges for inspection laws
• Section 113 – Intoxicating liquids
• Section 114 – States may not raise forces – Taxation of property of Commonwealth or State
• Section 115 – States not to coin money
• Section 116 – Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
• Section 117 – Rights of residents in States
• Section 118 – Recognition of laws, &c. of States
• Section 119 – Protection of States from invasion and violence
• Section 120 – Custody of offenders against laws of the Commonwealth
• Section 121 – New states may be admitted or established
• Section 122 – Government of territories
• Section 123 – Alteration of limits of States
• Section 124 – Formation of new States
• Section 125 – Seat of Government
• Section 126 – Power to Her Majesty to authorise Governor-General to appoint deputies
• Section 127 – Aboriginal natives not to be counted
• Section 128 – Mode of altering the Constitution

Source: https://australianpolitics.com/constitution/text

Fixated Persons Law - Asphyxiate the Fixated!

Image of insignia by Neil Crofski-Stocton

Two states have passed legislation regarding "Fixated Individuals".  Both New South Wales and Queensland have recently passed laws under the guise they are protecting people from terrorism with these measures. 

I am quite suspicious of this fact. These laws have been used to shut people up who speak out about corruption where government and corporations are concerned.  For example.  The young woman in Queensland Ms Fiona Wilson who blew the whistle on Origin Energy.  More on Queensland laws and Ms Wilson later.

The following is an article written on the Sydney Criminal Lawyers Website regarding the New South Wales version of this same law written by By Zeb Holmes and Ugur Nedim.  The opening paragraph says it all.

A new unit of the NSW Police Force has been created which is ostensibly aimed at combating lone-wolf terrorism by closely monitoring ‘fixated persons’. 

NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller has told the media that the unit will focus on the intersection between ‘radicalisation’, mental illness and lone-wolf attacks.However, there are concerns the unit will do little more than target, harass and silence those who speak out against the status quo.    Click the following link to read the article in full at the link below

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/nsw-police-to-target-potential-lone-wolf-terrorists/

The NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said there is this new phenomena with people who become fixated on particular issues or particular people who are related to particular issues.   This is so broad that I find it concerning to say the least. 

It seems as I said above, this is a smoke screen to fool the general public into believing its about stopping terrorism.  It is clear its not because they target people who speak out about corruption that in some way may link the government to the corrupt acts. 

We see this with Fiona Wilson in Brisbane.  Her next court case is on March 9.  Her case is bizarre to the onlooker.  Is this the Australia and the freedom our grandfathers fought and died for?  Somehow I do not think so and when the RSL hierarchy has been found corrupt last year; then you have no chance of bringing morality to the pointless deaths of thousands over the various wars governments create.

It is in the Australian Constitution, we have a implied right to dissent if we think that laws are made unfair.  Why is the Federal Government pushing the States so hard?  Its like they are all hiding something and Barnaby Joyce is just a smoke screen for the lot (Sacrificial Lamb)

IMPLIED RIGHT - implied right are derived from the rulings and constitutional interpretation of the High Court.

Implied rights are not clearly outlined in the Constitution but are suggested or inferred in its text. In a manner of speaking, implied rights are found by ‘reading between the lines’ of the Constitution. They are derived from a particular definition or interpretation of key words or phrases. Implied rights are considered, identified and outlined by the High Court, in cases the court is required to interpret the Constitution.

Read more here about our Implied Rights and our five Express Rights according to the Australian Constitution.   http://lawgovpol.com/express-rights-constitution/

While you are there, you might be wondering about how people stand with the law when it comes to protesting any of this legislation.

Notwithstanding the occasional recognition of protest as an object for legal protection, many of the cases illustrate the difficulty of balancing this with other interests at stake, notably public amenity, health or safety. The lofty rhetoric of speech protection rarely translates to legal success for protestors in a constitutional context. Conceptually, protest straddles categories ranging from speech to association and assembly, but it also struggles to achieve constitutional protection when operating as a ‘strategy of rupture’.

Thirdly, protest is protected in various statutes regulating police powers, public order and local government. An example of such protection is found in section 200 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 in NSW. The accompanying section 199 creates an offence for failure to comply with a direction. Section 200 provides that a police officer is not authorised to give such a direction in relation to ‘an apparently genuine demonstration or protest’.

The difficulty with these kinds of laws is that they are often subject to the discretion of relevant authorities. You might end up being able to establish your ‘right’ to protest in any given context, but this could involve significant legal risk, the possibility of arrest and conviction or civil penalty.

Protest can make history, it can speak truth to power, it can change the legal system itself, but it is indirectly and rather poorly protected. Protest, like democracy, is often messy, disruptive, inconvenient and even annoying, but as with free speech more broadly, it deserves more formal recognition and legal protection in Australia.   Read the article in full at this link below.  

http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/news/2016/02/there-right-protest-australia

Now, finally back to Fiona Wilson.  This Go Fund Me post came in my feed this morning and so it didn't take long to link the two states together with these similar laws.


From the GoFundMe Website   *Queensland Laws

Former Origin Energy executive and whistleblower Fiona Wilson has been detained by the new Queensland Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (QFTAC) and injected against her will and without any charges laid against her.
Fiona is appealing this and the next hearing is on March 9 in Brisbane. Fiona needs a barrister to represent her in court as the case is now very complex.
It is the opinion of an independent Clinical and Consulting Psychologist, and a qualified Counsellor, that Fiona was/is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) following the ordeal of blowing the whistle on the coal seam gas industry - and is NOT delusional, as the QFTAC have claimed.
The QFTAC are interpreting very broad definitions in Fiona's case. Fiona was merely trying to contact the relevant Queensland Minister about the evidence that she was exposing. Instead of acting on Fiona's evidence, the Minister referred her to QFTAC. 

Details of the QFTAC and Fiona's case are on Twitter here:
https://twitter.com/1earthmedia/status/956336176016732160?lang=enProactive intelligence agencies undoubtedly have their place, particularly in an ever-more-sophisticated world of anti-government activity. But so, of course, do concepts of open government, transparent and accountable law enforcement, and the right to dissent.
Unfortunately, the online QFTAC brochure is long on why ‘fixated persons’ must be monitored, but regrettably short on whether, and if so how, its own activities are. With no mention of any kind of public interest monitor, we’re left to wonder just precisely who is fixating on the people fixating on the fixated people.
Chris Nyst, Gold Coast Lawyer.
https://www.nystlegal.com.au/2017/05/26/fixated-folk/Fiona has since moved hundreds of kilometres away from Brisbane to begin a new life with her partner, but is still trapped in this new system. Fiona has exhausted her bank account fighting this to date but now needs a barrister to appeal the QFTAC's harsh new laws.

 

Images @ Eminpee Fotography

Stand Up strong against the Corrupt Recognise Campaign.

It is not time to RECOGNISE Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia’s already illegal Constitution document. This RECOGNISE document will ensure there are more places for racial discrimination than ever before. It is the wrong thing to do.

Today......

Today, at 8:30am the park next to the Museum of Contemporary Art at Circular Quay in Sydney City is the meeting place for people who are gathering to walk the iconic Sydney Harbour Bridge in protest to the secret government meeting to be held today at the Prime Ministers Sydney Home, Kirrabilli House. 

I am very aware and I realize up front that this protest action is difficult for some to understand given it all sounds so good on paper.  This is no mistake, and of course the government advisers have worded it wonderfully.  This is done so the sheeple just vote it in and the (government) dirty work is done.

This type of legislation will acquiesce all future rights to sovereignty for the first people of this land.  On this land the indigenous people have never given their blessing to the English.  There was no treaty.  The English broke all their own laws and stole the land with no conscience and the fight still rages some 250 years later.

The government still to this day have not given up with the sneaky tactics to unhitch the people from this great land here down under,  This latest escapade to steal the last of the last is just as sneaky as it always has been.

The "Recognise" referendum will come up in 2017 and this must be voted down.  The answer must be a resounding No Vote.   Become a "Recognise Buster".  If you see this logo, download it and use it to spread the word on the truth of this upcoming referendum.

This has to be sorted in truth or this country is doomed to await the Ragnarok period and the great cleansing and the hope to all go home.  The way things are being played out it is clear the government are using over arching psychological tools to distort the views of the masses.  The use of key well known aboriginal figures to convince the whiteys to vote yes on this is a low act. 

Many know these well known black fellahs as the Sell Out Blacks or as my Gomeroi friend calls them, the Chardonay Blacks.

The group of twenty people above are not qualified to speak for the 87% of black fellahs who don't want this to go ahead.  They are as follows:

Co Chairs - Mark Leibler, Pat Dodson
Non Parlimentary Members - Alison Page, Bill Lawson, Fred Chaney, Glenn Ferguson, Graham Bradley, Henry Burmester, Josephine Bourne, Lauren Ganley, Marcia Langton, Megan Davidson, Noel Pearson, Sam Jefferies, Timmy 'Djawa' Burarrwanga.
Parlimentary Members - Janelle Safin, Ken Wyatt, Rachel Siewert, Rob Oakeshott.
Ex Officio Members - Jodie Broun, Les Malezer, Mick Gooda.

My Flag Shirt

For more information on the resistance go to the Sovereign Union Website and read all the articles to enlighten yourself to this struggle  http://www.sovereignunion.mobi/node/2

Walking the highway in Deepwater

Images @ Eminpee Fotography - Flag

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY MAY BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

In Australia the entire Government is illegal because this country was sovereign and this was never ceded.

Parliamentary Sovereignty

The 'Divine Right of Kings' was a doctrine which asserted that the King at any given time was naturally God's Representative on Earth.

As time went by the Kings started to abuse their powers and this gave rise to discontent in the country and eventually the King's ministers grouped together and over-ruled the King, forming the first Parliament and thereby ending the Divine Right of Kings.

The original purpose in creating a Parliament was thus to end the Divine Right of Kings.

Therefore, even though we do not have a written constitution in Britain, it would seem that it must be unconstitutional for Parliament to assume what would appear to be a “Divine Right of Parliament” by enacting: the Public 'Order' Act; the Criminal 'Justice' Act; and now the Anti 'Terrorist' Act, which effectively say that Parliament can now make up any further acts they choose, and we are only allowed to protest against the acts if the Government allows us to do so. 
Read More at Ecotort Blog

English (and American) Law - Dr. Bonham's Case

Images @ Eminpee Fotography