 |
| Hegel's tombstone in Berlin (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
I have found that many people are baffled, and perhaps intimidated by the term “Hegelian Dialectic”, often thinking it is some deep philosophical concept that needs years of philosophy classes to decipher.
Thesis/Antithesis/Synthesis.
It is a cycle, each synthesis is a new thesis, a naturally arising antithesis arises at the same moment.
The next struggle of thesis v antithesis ensues until a new synthesis resolves it, and on and on.
As the Hegelian Diametric is a manufactured one with an end goal in mind; which is the Total State, or the State as God, as Hegel framed it, the final state of the full cycle then is that the final synthesis is the Total Global State, what is often called the New World Order.
We witness this as the Thesis as ‘crisis’ one that has been manufactured by those running the system. The resolution of the crisis is inherent in that crisis, but framed as a duality by the PR surrounding the crisis.
One ‘side’ would resolve the crisis in a certain fashion, the other ‘side’ would resolve it in a seeming different fashion, but inherent in each resolution is the strengthening of the authority of the state.
We saw this recently in the ‘crisis’ of the Presidential elections, both sides portraying the choice as a crisis if their candidate did not win. But the candidates do not differ in substance, but merely in style and appearances.
Both are agents of state power, and will increase it by their adherence to the agenda.
Thus one step further to the final Total State.
No comments:
Post a Comment